Implementation of Virtual Integrative Oncology Shared Medical Appointment Series (VIOSMAS) Within Mixed Diagnosis Population.

BACKGROUND: Integrative oncology [IO] is sought-after by patients, endorsed by clinical guidelines, and valued within National Cancer Institute Centers. Shared Medical Appointments [SMA] leverage health education and social connection to deliver enhanced patient experience, population health, cost-reduction, and clinician well-being. Integrative Oncology Shared Medical Appointments increase access to integrative medicine but delivering these services via telehealth have not been evaluated. OBJECTIVE: We created, and pilot tested a Virtual Integrative Oncology Shared Medical Appointment Series (VIOSMAS) to assess its feasibility, acceptability, and efficacy at an urban academic teaching hospital. METHODS: The 7-session hour-long Living Well with and after Cancer series included didactics, multi-disciplinary experiential sessions, and group discussion. Topics included (1) Introduction, (2) Herbs/Botanicals/Fungi, (3) Mindful Movement, (4) Acupuncture, (5) Narratives and Nature, (6) Diet and Culinary Medicine, and (7) Vitamins/Supplements. Virtual visits via telehealth were offered to enhance patient participation during the pandemic. Outcome measures included recruitment, retention, pre/post-series patient survey and qualitative clinician feedback. RESULTS: Between 9/2021 and 4/2023, 72 unique patients were recruited to 5 cohorts and had a total of 332 VIOSMAS visits. A total of 50 patients (69%) attended 4 or more of the 7-session series; 60 (83% were women); patients ranged in age from 28 to 93 years (median 66); 36 (50%) lived outside the city center; the most common cancer diagnoses were breast, lymphoma, and lung cancer. Patients were from diverse demographics. Pre-program, patients reported desiring assistance in addressing diverse symptoms including fatigue, insomnia, pain, gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms, anxiety, and depression. Post-series, patients reported that the VIOSMAS addressed their goals and symptoms; they also reported incorporating recommended lifestyle changes in diet, exercise, sleep, and stress management; they were satisfied with the number of sessions and telehealth format. The participating clinicians reported high levels of satisfaction with VIOSMAS. Revenue to the institution from VIOSMAS exceeded the revenue potential of equivalent time spent for individual visits while supporting extended physician-patient contact. CONCLUSION: VIOSMAS is feasible for patients and clinicians, addresses patients' symptoms and questions about lifestyle and complementary therapies, and generates more revenue than individual visits. Larger implementation trials with appropriate comparison groups are recommended.

Assessing the Severity of COVID-19 Lung Injury in Rheumatic Diseases Versus the General Population Using Deep Learning-Derived Chest Radiograph Scores.

OBJECTIVE: COVID-19 patients with rheumatic disease have a higher risk of mechanical ventilation than the general population. The present study was undertaken to assess lung involvement using a validated deep learning algorithm that extracts a quantitative measure of radiographic lung disease severity. METHODS: We performed a comparative cohort study of rheumatic disease patients with COVID-19 and ≥1 chest radiograph within ±2 weeks of COVID-19 diagnosis and matched comparators. We used unadjusted and adjusted (for age, Charlson comorbidity index, and interstitial lung disease) quantile regression to compare the maximum pulmonary x-ray severity (PXS) score at the 10th to 90th percentiles between groups. We evaluated the association of severe PXS score (>9) with mechanical ventilation and death using Cox regression. RESULTS: We identified 70 patients with rheumatic disease and 463 general population comparators. Maximum PXS scores were similar in the rheumatic disease patients and comparators at the 10th to 60th percentiles but significantly higher among rheumatic disease patients at the 70th to 90th percentiles (90th percentile score of 10.2 versus 9.2; adjusted P = 0.03). Rheumatic disease patients were more likely to have a PXS score of >9 (20% versus 11%; P = 0.02), indicating severe pulmonary disease. Rheumatic disease patients with PXS scores >9 versus ≤9 had higher risk of mechanical ventilation (hazard ratio [HR] 24.1 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 6.7, 86.9]) and death (HR 8.2 [95% CI 0.7, 90.4]). CONCLUSION: Rheumatic disease patients with COVID-19 had more severe radiographic lung involvement than comparators. Higher PXS scores were associated with mechanical ventilation and will be important for future studies leveraging big data to assess COVID-19 outcomes in rheumatic disease patients.

Demographic, Lifestyle, and Serologic Risk Factors for Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA)-associated Bronchiectasis: Role of RA-related Autoantibodies.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate demographic, lifestyle, and serologic risk factors for isolated rheumatoid arthritis (RA)-associated bronchiectasis (RA-BR) that is not a result of interstitial lung disease (ILD). METHODS: We performed a case-control study using patients with RA from the Mass General Brigham Biobank. We reviewed the records of all patients with RA meeting the 2010 American College of Rheumatology/European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology criteria with computed tomography (CT) chest imaging to identify RA-BR cases and controls with RA and RA-related lung disease. For each patient, the CT chest imaging that was performed closest to enrollment was independently reviewed by 2 radiologists for the presence of RA-related lung diseases. Cases had clinical and radiologic evidence of RA-BR without interstitial lung abnormalities on imaging. Controls had RA and no evidence of bronchiectasis or ILD. We examined the associations between demographic, lifestyle, and serologic factors with RA-BR using multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: We identified 57 cases of isolated RA-BR and 360 RA controls without RA-related lung disease. In multivariable models, RA-BR was associated with older age at RA onset (OR 1.37 per 10 years, 95% CI 1.02-1.82), lower BMI at RA diagnosis (OR 0.94 per kg/m2, 95% CI 0.89-0.99), seropositive RA (OR 3.96, 95% CI 1.84-8.53), positive rheumatoid factor (OR 4.40, 95% CI 2.14-9.07), and positive anticyclic citrullinated peptide (OR 3.47, 95% CI 1.65-7.31). Higher titers of RA-related autoantibodies were associated with higher odds of RA-BR. CONCLUSION: Seropositivity, older age at RA diagnosis, and lower BMI at RA onset were associated with isolated bronchiectasis in RA that was not a result of ILD. These findings expand the list of potential risk factors for RA-BR and suggest a pathogenic link between airway inflammation and RA-related autoantibodies.

Associations of the MUC5B promoter variant with timing of interstitial lung disease and rheumatoid arthritis onset.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the associations of the common MUC5B promoter variant with timing of RA-associated interstitial lung disease (RA-ILD) and RA onset. METHODS: We identified patients with RA meeting 2010 ACR/EULAR criteria and available genotype information in the Mass General Brigham Biobank, a multihospital biospecimen and clinical data collection research study. We determined RA-ILD presence by reviewing all RA patients who had CT imaging, lung biopsy or autopsy results. We determined the dates of RA and RA-ILD diagnoses by manual records review. We examined the associations of the MUC5B promoter variant (G>T at rs35705950) with RA-ILD, RA-ILD occurring before or within 2 years of RA diagnosis and RA diagnosis at age >55 years. We used multivariable logistic regression to estimate odds ratios (ORs) for each outcome by MUC5B promoter variant status, adjusting for potential confounders including genetic ancestry and smoking. RESULTS: We identified 1005 RA patients with available genotype data for rs35705950 (mean age 45 years, 79% female, 81% European ancestry). The MUC5B promoter variant was present in 155 (15.4%) and was associated with RA-ILD [multivariable OR 3.34 (95% CI 1.97, 5.60)], RA-ILD before or within 2 years of RA diagnosis [OR 4.01 (95% CI 1.78, 8.80)] and RA onset after age 55 years [OR 1.52 (95% CI 1.08, 2.12)]. CONCLUSIONS: The common MUC5B promoter variant was associated with RA-ILD onset earlier in the RA disease course and older age of RA onset. These findings suggest that the MUC5B promoter variant may impact RA-ILD risk early in the RA disease course, particularly in patients with older-onset RA.

Predictors of Rheumatic Immune-Related Adverse Events and De Novo Inflammatory Arthritis After Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Treatment for Cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To identify predictors of rheumatic immune-related adverse events (irAEs) following immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) treatment for cancer. METHODS: We performed a case-control study to predict the occurrence of rheumatic irAEs in cancer patients who initiated ICI treatment at Mass General Brigham and the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute between 2011 and 2020. We screened for the presence of rheumatic irAEs by reviewing the medical records of patients evaluated by rheumatologists or those prescribed nonglucocorticoid immunomodulatory drugs after the time of ICI initiation (baseline). Review of medical records confirmed the presence of rheumatic irAEs and the indications necessitating immunomodulatory drug treatment. Controls were defined as patients who did not experience rheumatic irAEs, did not have preexisting rheumatic disease, did not have a clinical evaluation by a rheumatologist after ICI treatment, did not receive an immunomodulatory drug after ICI, did not receive systemic glucocorticoids after ICI, and survived at least 6 months after the initial ICI treatment. We used logistic regression to estimate the odds ratios (ORs) (with 95% confidence intervals [95% CIs]) for the risk of a rheumatic irAE in the presence of various baseline predictors. RESULTS: A total of 8,028 ICI recipients were identified (mean age 65.5 years, 43.1% female, 31.8% with lung cancer). After ICI initiation, 404 patients (5.0%) were evaluated by rheumatologists, and 475 patients (5.9%) received an immunomodulatory drug to treat any irAEs. There were 226 confirmed rheumatic irAE cases (2.8%) and 118 de novo inflammatory arthritis cases (1.5%). Rheumatic diseases (either preexisting rheumatic diseases or rheumatic irAEs) were a common indication for immunomodulatory drug use (27.9%). Baseline predictors of rheumatic irAEs included melanoma (multivariable OR 4.06 [95% CI 2.54-6.51]) and genitourinary (GU) cancer (OR 2.22 [95% CI 1.39-3.54]), both relative to patients with lung cancer; combination ICI treatment (OR 2.35 [95% CI 1.48-3.74]), relative to patients receiving programmed death 1 inhibitor monotherapy; autoimmune disease (OR 2.04 [95% CI 1.45-2.85]) and recent glucocorticoid use (OR 2.13 [95% CI 1.51-2.98]), relative to patients not receiving a glucocorticoid, compared to the 2,312 controls without rheumatic irAEs. Predictors of de novo inflammatory arthritis were similar to those of rheumatic irAEs. CONCLUSION: We identified novel predictors of rheumatic irAE development in cancer patients, including baseline presence of melanoma, baseline presence of GU tract cancer, preexisting autoimmune disease, receiving or having received combination ICI treatment, and receiving or having received glucocorticoids. The proportion of cancer patients experiencing rheumatic irAEs may be even higher than was reported in the present study, since we used stringent criteria to identify cases of rheumatic irAEs. Our findings could be used to identify cancer patients at risk of developing rheumatic irAEs and de novo inflammatory arthritis and may help further elucidate the pathogenesis of rheumatic irAEs in patients with cancer who are receiving ICI treatment.

Coronavirus Disease 2019 Outcomes Among Recipients of Anti-CD20 Monoclonal Antibodies for Immune-Mediated Diseases: A Comparative Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVE: Patients with immune-mediated diseases treated with anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies may have worse coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outcomes due to impaired humoral immunity, but differences compared with the general population are unknown. METHODS: We identified patients with immune-mediated diseases who received anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies within 1 year prior to the index date of polymerase chain reaction-confirmed COVID-19 between January 31, 2020, and January 31, 2021. General population comparators with COVID-19 were matched up 5:1 by age, sex, and polymerase chain reaction date. Unadjusted and multivariable adjusted (for age, race, body mass index, and Charlson Comorbidity Index) hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for hospitalization, mechanical ventilation, and death in recipients of anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies versus comparators were estimated by using Cox regression. RESULTS: We identified 114 cases patients COVID-19 who had received anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies for immune-mediated diseases (mean age 55 years, 70% female) and 559 matched comparators with COVID-19 (mean age 54 years, 70% female). Patients treated with anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies had higher mortality (adjusted HR 2.16; 95% CI: 1.03-4.54) than matched comparators. Risks of hospitalization (adjusted HR 0.88; 95% CI: 0.62-1.26) and mechanical ventilation use (adjusted HR 0.82; 95% CI: 0.36-1.87) were similar. Similar trends were seen in analyses according to type of indication (eg, rheumatic or neurologic disease) and duration of anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody use (<1 or ≥1 year) and after patients with interstitial lung disease, those with cancer, and those on glucocorticoids prior to COVID-19 diagnosis were excluded. CONCLUSION: Patients who received anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies for immune-mediated diseases prior to COVID-19 had higher mortality following COVID-19 than matched comparators, highlighting the urgent need to mitigate excess risks in recipients of anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies during the ongoing pandemic.

Prevalence and risk factors of bronchiectasis in rheumatoid arthritis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis for the prevalence and risk factors of rheumatoid arthritis-related bronchiectasis (RA-BR). METHODS: We queried PubMed and EMBASE databases to identify published literature related to prevalence and risk factors for RA-BR among patients with RA. Data extraction included study design, country, year, method of RA-BR detection, RA characteristics, numerator of RA-BR cases and denominator of patients with RA, and associations with RA-BR presence. We performed a meta-analysis using random or fixed effects models to estimate the prevalence of RA-BR among RA. RESULTS: Out of a total of 253 studies, we identified 41 total studies that reported on prevalence (n = 34), risk factors (n = 5), or both (n = 2). The included studies had heterogeneous methods to identify RA-BR. Among the 36 studies reporting prevalence, 608 RA-BR cases were identified from a total of 8569 patients with RA. In the meta-analysis, the pooled overall prevalence of RA-BR among RA was 18.7% (95%CI 13.7-24.3%) using random effects and 3.8% (95%CI 3.3-4.2%) using fixed effects. Among studies that used high-resolution chest computed tomography (HRCT) imaging, the prevalence of RA-BR was 22.6% (95%CI 16.8-29.0%) using random effects. When only considering retrospective studies (n = 12), the pooled prevalence of RA-BR among RA was 15.5% (95%CI 7.5-25.5%); among prospective studies (n = 24), the pooled prevalence was 20.7% (95% CI 14.7-27.4%). Risk factors for RA-BR included older age, longer RA duration, genetics (CFTR and HLA), and undetectable circulating mannose binding lectin (MBL) as a biomarker. CONCLUSION: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, the prevalence of RA-BR was nearly 20% among studies with HRCT imaging, suggesting that bronchiectasis may be a common extra-articular feature of RA. Relatively few factors have been associated with RA-BR. Future studies should standardize methods to identify RA-BR cases and investigate the natural history and clinical course given the relatively high prevalence among RA.

COVID-19 Outcomes Among Users of CD20 Inhibitors for Immune-Mediated Diseases: A Comparative Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVE: Patients with immune-mediated diseases treated with CD20 inhibitors may have worse COVID-19 outcomes due to impaired humoral immunity, but differences versus the general population are unknown. METHODS: We identified patients with immune-mediated diseases who received CD20 inhibitors within one year prior to the index date of PCR-confirmed COVID-19 between January 31, 2020, and January 31, 2021. Comparators with COVID-19 were matched up to 5:1 by age, sex, and PCR date. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for hospitalization, mechanical ventilation, and death in CD20 inhibitor users versus comparators were estimated using Cox regression. RESULTS: We identified 114 cases with COVID-19 who had received CD20 inhibitors for immune-mediated diseases (mean age 55 years, 70% female) and 559 matched comparators with COVID-19 (mean age 54 years, 70% female). CD20 inhibitor-treated cases had higher mortality (aHR 2.16; 95% CI: 1.03 to 4.54) than matched comparators. Risks of hospitalization (aHR 0.88; 95% CI: 0.62 to 1.26) and mechanical ventilation (aHR 0.82; 95% CI: 0.36 to 1.87) were similar. Similar trends were seen in analyses according to type of indication (e.g., rheumatic or neurologic disease) and duration of CD20 inhibitor use (<1 or ≥1 year), and after excluding patients with interstitial lung disease, cancer, and those on glucocorticoids prior to COVID-19 diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who received CD20 inhibitors for immune-mediated diseases prior to COVID-19 had higher mortality following COVID-19 than matched comparators, highlighting the urgent need to mitigate excess risks in CD20 inhibitor users during the ongoing pandemic. KEY MESSAGES: What is already known about this subject?: Patients with immune-mediated diseases treated with CD20 inhibitors may have worse COVID-19 outcomes than those treated with other immunomodulatory medications, but differences compared to the general population are unknown.What does this study add?: CD20 inhibitor-treated cases had over two-fold higher risk of mortality than matched general population comparators, although risks of hospitalization and mechanical ventilation were similar.How might this impact on clinical practice or future developments?: There is an urgent need for risk mitigation strategies, such as SARS-CoV-2 monoclonal antibodies or booster vaccinations, for patients with immune-mediated diseases treated with CD20 inhibitors during the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic.

Passive Smoking Throughout the Life Course and the Risk of Incident Rheumatoid Arthritis in Adulthood Among Women.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate passive smoking throughout the life course and the risk of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), while accounting for personal smoking. METHODS: We analyzed the Nurses' Health Study II prospective cohort, using information collected via biennial questionnaires. We assessed the influence of 1) maternal smoking during pregnancy (in utero exposure), 2) childhood parental smoking, and 3) years lived with smokers since age 18. Incident RA and serostatus were determined by medical record review. Using the marginal structural model framework, we estimated the controlled direct effect of each passive smoking exposure on adult incident RA risk by serologic phenotype, controlling for early-life factors and time-updated adulthood factors including personal smoking. RESULTS: Among 90,923 women, we identified 532 incident RA cases (66% seropositive) during a median of 27.7 years of follow-up. Maternal smoking during pregnancy was associated with RA after adjustment for confounders, with a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.25 (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 1.03-1.52), but not after accounting for subsequent smoking exposures. Childhood parental smoking was associated with seropositive RA after adjustment for confounders (HR 1.41 [95% CI 1.08-1.83]). In the controlled direct effect analyses, childhood parental smoking was associated with seropositive RA (HR 1.75 [95% CI 1.03-2.98]) after controlling for adulthood personal smoking, and the association was accentuated among ever smokers (HR 2.18 [95% CI 1.23-3.88]). There was no significant association of adulthood passive smoking with RA (HR 1.30 for ≥20 years of living with a smoker versus none [95% CI 0.97-1.74]). CONCLUSION: We found a potential direct influence of childhood parental smoking on adult-onset incident seropositive RA even after controlling for adulthood personal smoking.

Relationship Between Rheumatoid Arthritis and Pulmonary Function Measures on Spirometry in the UK Biobank.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the independent relationship of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) to the type and severity of pulmonary patterns on spirometry compared to the pulmonary patterns in general population controls. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, we investigated the association of RA with pulmonary function measures on spirometry among subjects in the UK Biobank who underwent spirometry for research purposes. RA cases were identified based on self-report and current disease-modifying antirheumatic drug/glucocorticoid use. Controls were subjects without RA from the general population. Outcome measures included continuous forced expiratory volume in 1 second percent predicted (FEV1 %) and forced vital capacity percent predicted (FVC%), type of spirometric pattern (restrictive or obstructive), and severity of the restrictive or obstructive pattern. We used multivariable regression to estimate the effects in RA cases compared to the effects in controls, adjusting for age, sex, body mass index, and smoking status/pack-years. RESULTS: Among 350,776 analyzed subjects who underwent spirometry (mean age 56.3 years; 55.8% female; 45.5% ever smokers), we identified 2,008 cases of treated RA. In multivariable analyses, RA was associated with lower FEV1 % (ß = -2.93 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) -3.63, -2.24]), FVC% (ß = -2.08 [95% CI -2.72, -1.45]), and FEV1 /FVC (ß = -0.008 [95% CI -0.010, -0.005]) compared to controls. RA was additionally associated with restrictive patterns (odds ratio [OR] 1.36 [95% CI 1.21, 1.52]) and obstructive patterns (OR 1.21 [95% CI 1.07, 1.37]) independent of confounders, and was most strongly associated with severe restrictive and obstructive patterns. CONCLUSION: RA is associated with increased odds of restrictive and obstructive patterns, and this relationship is not explained by confounders, including smoking status. In addition to restrictive lung disease, clinicians should also be aware that airway obstruction may be a pulmonary manifestation of RA.

Inhalants other than personal cigarette smoking and risk for developing rheumatoid arthritis.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The current review summarizes the current evidence on inhalants other than personal cigarette smoking and risk for developing rheumatoid arthritis (RA). RECENT FINDINGS: Personal cigarette smoking has been implicated as an environmental risk factor for seropositive RA, perhaps by inducing autoimmunity at pulmonary mucosa. Since many patients with RA are nonsmokers, other inhalants are being investigated as potential RA risk factors. Recent case-control and cohort studies have investigated passive cigarette smoking, air pollution, inhalant-related occupations, silica, pesticides, household environment, and allergic inhalants as inhalant exposures for RA risk. Inhalant-related occupations and silica inhalants have the most consistent evidence for associations with increased RA risk. However, most studies relied on retrospective designs and had limited ability to adjust for personal cigarette smoking or investigate associations among nonsmokers. SUMMARY: Several inhalants other than personal cigarette smoking may be associated with increased risk for developing RA. These results support the hypothesis that inhalants, pulmonary mucosal inflammation, and RA pathogenesis may be linked. Future studies are needed to firmly establish the independence of these findings from personal cigarette smoking and to determine the specific inhalants and biologic mechanisms related to RA pathogenesis.